THE TORUS-PEARLSTRING PROPOSAL /
Article from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Quantum World

last update: Jan. 6. '17


There are a number of mathematical models,
that descibe a Torus in a vertical splice, or cut.

In the Cassini oval, the curve has double points at the circular points at infinity.


The images in this article can be enlarged by clicking on them.





"THE TORUS-PEARLSTRING PROPOSAL"
An Amendment to H. Minkowki's Analogon of the Cosmos as a Sphere, the Torus

Sadly, no copy of this 78 page manuscript has survived, as far as I know.
This is an attempt at recalling that paper, and bring it to it's conclusion.

It had occured to me in 1986, that the model (topology) of Albert Einstein's Universe,
which he used to describe his theory of relativity, was based on the idea of his teacher,
Hermann Minkowski, and that it was incomplete.

Instead of thinking of the topology (geometry) of the Universe as a ball (or sphere),
I visualized it as a donut, or a bagel-like shape, a torus, in proper terms.

This I thought to be so important that I went to a business supply shop and leased an electrical typewriter,
the fancy kind at the time, with a daisy-wheel and 500k of memory.

The following months were spent trying to put my vision into words and diagrams.

Much of the paper dealt with geometry, by its nature.

It described shapes, such as two dimensional triangles, three dimensional pyramids,
geometry and it drew analogies to cosmological and theoretical physics.

Whilst writing the manuscript I became very sensitive to patterns.

Our TV set was of the analogue type, with an UHF aerial on the roof.
I became curious about the interference patterns, which manifested themselves when the
TV set was tuned to the white noise of empty channels.

Now, in the West of Ireland, there are not many TV transmitters that can cause interference in the unoccupied frequencies.

Many nights, when I tuned into the white noise, a man stood in front of a blackboard,
sketching symbols during the night until the early morning hours.

So, the lecture broadcasts I picked up, were did they originate?
The signal reception was always too bad to hear any audio besides static.

This was at a time when the Irish TV stations played the National Anthem at 11pm and then shut off until 6am the next day.

It must be said, I formed a theory at the time, that these were broadcasts from the future.
Today, lacking evidence to the contrary, the more likely explanation is that I picked up the BBC Open University
rebroadcasted from Irish television deflector systems.

I can't explain the rather unusual night viewing times, of topics such as "Number Theory Metric and Topological Space" or
"Godels incompleteness theorems", but it makes sense that I was watching Open University lectures, that made their way into my subconscious.

There they gestated for a few decades.
But that is yet to come.



THE LUCASIAN CHAIR OF MATHEMATICS


With the "Torus-Pearlstring Proposal" in my luggage I travelled in 1987 to Cambridge University, England.
There I handed my paper in to Stephen Hawking, the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics, in Silver Street
(the department has since moved to a different location).

Stephen Hawking's secretary brought it to Stephen's office, where it remained 25 minutes before it was returned to me.
Without a positive response from Cambridge University, I then took up a job as catering assistant in the "Footlights"
restaurant until 1988.

Without feedback or comments from the University, I proceeded to forget my experiences and writings.
My paper was not conclusive, sufficiently coherent, compelling, or mathematically described.

Many illustrations and ideas from this book I found later mirrored in books from the New Age movement.
I don't know how the graphics made it into those publications.

But I shook my head, the concepts had not been developed,
no further or deeper meaning was discovered or revealed in these New Age writings,
from my point of view.

Maybe there is a common subconscious, were all these images, symbols and archetypes float around,
only rarely surfacing. And then we struggle to make sense of it all.


The Torus-Pearlstring Proposal revisited


Solid Torus

 

 

 

 

 

Solid Torus by Oleg Alexandrov

Revisiting the unlikely story of the "Torus-Pearlstring Proposal" from 1987:
today, in 2017, I can tie up a loose end.

My paper attempted to
describe the Cosmos as being toroidal in nature.

That idea was not unique in a certain aspect.

Unknown to me at the time, a similar proposal had been advanced for the first time in 1984,
by the Russian team Alexi Starobinski and Yakov B. Zeldovich:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-torus_model_of_the_universe


Here is a well written New York Times article on this subject,
and how it links to the Cosmic Background radiation:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/11/science/universe-as-doughnut-new-data-new-debate.html


There are two methods of slicing a torus, horizontal or vertical.

Gravity well1.) It can be sliced horizontally,
and the slices (depending on thickness) conform to the Minkowski space-time analogue.

This can be called the Bagel Torus.

This is what we see in space time diagrams,
describing the elasticity of a space-time sheet
under the influence of gravity.






Torus sliced vertically2.) It can be sliced vertically, and the slices conform in the shape to the Cosmic microwave background radiation.

That slicing method results in the Doughnut Torus.

A torus sliced in half vertically in its center appears as two pearls (also described as balls or disks), see slice 3.

Depending on the slice, the shape of the disk changes.

There are a number of mathematical models,
that descibe a Torus in a vertical splice.

In the Cassini oval, the curve has double points at the circular points at infinity, in other words the curve is bicircular.

There are also true ellipses to be found in a torus when r=R.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassini_oval
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiric_section
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemniscate_of_Bernoulli




The Torus-Pearlstring Proposal approaches the Torus as Dupin cyclide,
which is a geometric inversion of a standard torus
.
.

Dupin Cyclide
Image: Dupin Cyclide
By Ag2gaeh (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)], via Wikimedia Commons



What I had never understood really, until today, was what the "Pearlstring" aspect of my proposal meant.
I had put it in, just because I liked the sound of it at the time...


Now, here is a possible partial answer.

Pearl string
Image from Brian Scott Whited: "TANGENT-BALL TECHNIQUES FOR SHAPE PROCESSING",
Georgia Institute of Technology, Doctorate of Philosophy in the College of Computing. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/31670


to be continued...
-------------------- article under this line under review -------------------

Recall
Torus Pearlstring Proposal 
The development of a fetus to a baby to an child to a teenager follows our comprehension of the World: at the beginning we have difficulty grasping at objects, because we have no grasp of three dimensions as baby. Our understanding grows as we age.

So can a toddler already navigate on the floor and soon he will start playing with balls.

This is our current level of understanding of the Cosmos. Our model of the Universe is based on a ball, a sphere.

Albert Einsteins teacher developed it before the theory of Relativity, he made a model of spacetime. That Albert Einstein adopted.

However, it is shown, that any equal property is applicable to the Torus, the advantages of which I shall explain in the future.

A stone thrown into water creates circles that forever expand

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/11/science/universe-as-doughnut-new-data-new-debate.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-torus_model_of_the_universe#cite_note-NYT-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dupin_cyclide